Connect with us

Entertainment

How Google searches may show who we are and what we want (Book Review)

Published

on

By Vikas Datta
Title: Everybody Lies – What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are; Author: Seth Stephens-Davidowitz; Publisher: Bloomsbury; Pages: 352; Price: Rs 499

It may have been the first to indicate Donald Trump would be the next US President, but while vintage radio show character “The Shadow” knew what evil lurks in the hearts of men, it also knows about human attitude, behaviour and mindsets — from the extent of racism in America, sex desires and worries worldwide, if sons or daughters are preferred, if people have read the books they claim to and much more.

This revealer of secrets, or rather a powerful computational technique which can find out anything is the much-misunderstood “Big Data” and its instrument is no more than “the everyday act of typing a word or phrase into a compact rectangular white box”.

For these, says data scientist-turned-economist Seth Stephens Davidowitz, “leaves a trace of truth that, when multiplied by millions, eventually reveals profound realities”.

Some may have realised this “white box” is the Google search box. But it is not only an online search tool, for, as he contends — and shows in this book — it is a receptacle for some of the things we really believe or think but don’t reveal, as well an oracle for what we want to know, but don’t want to ask anyone.

And with a range of Google tools to facilitate analysis of all this Big Data, we can learn much more about who people “really are” and what they actually think or do as opposed to what they say they think or have done or will do.

Davidowitz, an internet data expert who daily tracks the digital trails of people traversing the web for this purpose, argues the approach can be more reliable as people are much liable to be less than true in surveys — which teenagers mostly take perverse pleasure in distorting — or on social media.

To back his claim about surveys, he cites a telling discrepancy from Americans sex lives, citing a respected survey which reports a wide divergence in the number of condoms heterosexual men and woman say they use per year, while condom sales are only a little above half of the lower figure.

Beginning with his claim how internet searches showed that Trump was poised to win — and making a compelling case, interspersed with how he got into the field and the tools that helped (eg, Google Trends) him, Davidowitz notes that initially online search data was not deemed a proper information source for “serious” research.

Google was intended to help people to learn about the world, not to help researchers learn about people, he says, but “it turns out that the trails we leave as we seek knowledge on the internet are tremendously revealing”.

And while seeking to draw all kinds of information from this large reservoir (not only limited to Google) of unguarded and uninhibited opinions and questions — including how correct are the psychological theories of Sigmund Freud, the surprising sex demand of Indian husbands, the worrying extent of racism in the US, the relation between reel and real crime, anxiety levels after terror attacks, how the best racehorses were chosen and more intriguing stuff — Davidowitz also seeks to tell us what Big Data really is — and how new, how “big” it should be, and how intuitive it actually is.

He is understandably gung-ho over his approach, but while he also points out its limitations — understanding correlation may not establish an understanding causation; also, the link between online searches and real personalities may be a compelling but not conclusive, and in such complex entities such as people, there can be more contributory factors towards attitudes than only online behaviour.

However, it is a start on what promises to be a key source of information about us in an increasingly digital world and Davidowitz’s accessible, witty but incisive account, which he terms as the new level of (the interesting but now a bit discredited) “Freakonomics” and replete with a wide range of research, anecdotes, personal experiences and telling facts, is a good start to understanding its principles and intricacies.

(Vikas Datta can be contacted at [email protected])

–IANS
vd/sac

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Casino Days Reveal Internal Data on Most Popular Smartphones

Published

on

By

CasinoDays India

International online casino Casino Days has published a report sharing their internal data on what types and brands of devices are used to play on the platform by users from the South Asian region.

Such aggregate data analyses allow the operator to optimise their website for the brands and models of devices people are actually using.

The insights gained through the research also help Casino Days tailor their services based on the better understanding of their clients and their needs.

Desktops and Tablets Lose the Battle vs Mobile

The primary data samples analysed by Casino Days reveal that mobile connections dominate the market in South Asia and are responsible for a whopping 96.6% of gaming sessions, while computers and tablets have negligible shares of 2.9% and 0.5% respectively.

CasinoDays India

The authors of the study point out that historically, playing online casino was exclusively done on computers, and attribute thе major shift to mobile that has unfolded over time to the wide spread of cheaper smartphones and mobile data plans in South Asia.

“Some of the reasons behind this massive difference in device type are affordability, technical advantages, as well as cheaper and more obtainable internet plans for mobiles than those for computers,” the researchers comment.

Xiaomi and Vivo Outperform Samsung, Apple Way Down in Rankings

Chinese brands Xiaomi and Vivo were used by 21.9% and 20.79% of Casino Days players from South Asia respectively, and together with the positioned in third place with a 18.1% share South Korean brand Samsung dominate the market among real money gamers in the region.

 

CasinoDays India

Cupertino, California-based Apple is way down in seventh with a user share of just 2.29%, overshadowed by Chinese brands Realme (11.43%), OPPO (11.23%), and OnePlus (4.07%).

Huawei is at the very bottom of the chart with a tiny share just below the single percent mark, trailing behind mobile devices by Motorola, Google, and Infinix.

The data on actual phone usage provided by Casino Days, even though limited to the gaming parts of the population of South Asia, paints a different picture from global statistics on smartphone shipments by vendors.

Apple and Samsung have been sharing the worldwide lead for over a decade, while current regional leader Xiaomi secured their third position globally just a couple of years ago.

Striking Android Dominance among South Asian Real Money Gaming Communities

The shifted market share patterns of the world’s top smartphone brands in South Asia observed by the Casino Days research paper reveal a striking dominance of Android devices at the expense of iOS-powered phones.

On the global level, Android enjoys a comfortable lead with a sizable 68.79% share which grows to nearly 79% when we look at the whole continent of Asia. The data on South Asian real money gaming communities suggests that Android’s dominance grows even higher and is north of the 90% mark.

Among the major factors behind these figures, the authors of the study point to the relative affordability of and greater availability of Android devices in the region, especially when manufactured locally in countries like India and Vietnam.

“And, with influencers and tech reviews putting emphasis on Android devices, the choice of mobile phone brand and OS becomes easy; Android has a much wider range of products and caters to the Asian online casino market in ways that Apple can’t due to technical limitations,” the researchers add.

The far better integration achieved by Google Pay compared to its counterpart Apple Pay has also played a crucial role in shaping the existing smartphone market trends.

 

Content provided by Adverloom

Continue Reading

Trending