Entertainment
Surprises and shockers: ‘Baahubali’ sets Rs 500 cr bar for Bollywood (2017 in Retrospect)
By Radhika Bhirani and Sandeep Sharma
Mumbai, Dec 30 (IANS) The highest earning film in India this year — “Baahubali 2: The Conclusion” — was neither an original Hindi movie nor featured an established star. That says a lot about the changing dynamics of Bollywood which, in 2017, saw a mixed bag of projects that drew audiences mainly with solid content, notwithstanding star power.
Salman Khan’s “Tubelight”, Shah Rukh Khan’s “Jab Harry Met Sejal” and Ranbir Kapoor-starrer “Jagga Jasoos” are cases in point. They failed to elicit the expected response despite the buzz — falling flat in such a way that Salman and Shah Rukh reportedly compensated the distributors for the losses they incurred due to their movies.
There is no centralised agency to record Bollywood’s box office numbers. But as per trade experts, while no Bollywood film has so far managed to cross the Rs 400 crore mark at the domestic box office, S.S. Rajamouli’s magnum opus “Baahubali 2: The Conclusion” — featuring Prabhas, Rana Daggubati and Anushka Shetty — did the unexpected by minting Rs 510.99 crore.
Siddharth Roy Kapur, President of the Film and Television Producers Guild of India, says “Baahubali 2: The Conclusion” — the sequel to hugely successful fantasy drama “Baahubali: The Beginning” — was a game changer as “a dubbed Telugu language film became the biggest Hindi language blockbuster of all time”.
“It really says a lot to everyone who works within Hindi cinema. It says that we can’t make any excuses. ‘Baahubali’, in conventional terms, had everything going against it. The Hindi audience has traditionally not looked at southern stars as appealing and those who featured in ‘Baahubali’ had no name recognition in the Hindi market.
“Dubbed movies were always considered to be weaker at the box office because of the fact that they were not in the original language. But ‘Baahubali’ has come and dispelled all those myths,” Kapur told IANS.
Largely, it boils down to the fact that “if you give people a cinematic experience and have the confidence and the gusto and the flair to be able to tell that story uninhibitedly in the way you want to tell it, then the audience will come and watch the film,” Kapur added.
As far as Bollywood originals are concerned, nine films marched past the Rs 100 crore benchmark in a year when the central government introduced Goods and Services Tax (GST) — for tickets below Rs 100, it stands at 18 per cent and for tickets above Rs 100 at 28 per cent.
“Tiger Zinda Hai” turned out to be the highest grosser among Bollywood originals with a collection of Rs 206.4 crore till December 28.
Even the team of Reliance Entertainment-backed “Golmaal Again” laughed its way to the bank with a collection of Rs 205.67 crore.
There were others — “Raees” (Rs 137.71 crore), “Kaabil” (Rs 103.84 crore), “Jolly LLB 2” (Rs 117 crore), “Badrinath Ki Dulhania” (Rs 116.68 crore), “Toilet: Ek Prem Katha” (Rs 134.22 crore), “Judwaa 2” (Rs 138.61 crore) and the latest, “Tiger Zinda Hai” (Rs 173 crore and counting).
“Tubelight”, though not counted among Salman’s hits, also went past the Rs 100 crore mark by minting Rs 119.26 crore.
According to Kamal Gianchandani, CEO, PVR Pictures, “Tubelight” was one example of how “stars on their own are not enough to pull in audiences”.
“See Salman in ‘Tiger Zinda Hai’. It’s an established franchise but also a film with a strong nationalistic flavour and content that’s appealing to a broad section of people. It has been a respite at the box office, but see the same Salman in a long and slow film like ‘Tubelight’, which was not suitable to the actor’s image,” Gianchandani told IANS.
“Well-drafted, well-written, well-packaged and well-presented content with a star, creates magic at the box office,” added Gianchandani, who appreciated how smaller films like “Newton” and “Tumhari Sulu” did well.
“Each time there was a good film, the audiences came out in big numbers and supported it.”
“Naam Shabana”, “Hindi Medium”, “Sachin – A Billion Dreams”, “Mom”, “Lipstick Under My Burkha”, “Bareilly Ki Barfi”, “Shubh Mangal Saavdhan”, “Secret Superstar” and “Fukrey Returns” were some such titles which found resonance with the audience. As always, content was king.
The movies which fell flat against expectations include “Ok Jaanu”, “Rangoon”, “Begum Jaan”, “Noor”, “Sarkar 3”, “Meri Pyaari Bindu”, “Raabta”, “A Gentleman”, “Simran”, “Bhoomi”, “Haseena Parkar”, “Chef” and “Firangi”.
Besides that, the big-ticket “Padmavati”, which was due to release on December 1, got caught in a spiralling controversy which has kept it away from hitting the screens.
Girish Johar, film business and trade analyst, told IANS: “Had ‘Baahubali’ not been there, Bollywood would have performed poorly. Hindi films per se haven’t done great. ‘Padmavati’ was supposed to release in December, but it did not, so all eyes were on ‘Tiger Zinda Hai’.
“I think we are still falling short of 10-12 per cent on the annual box office returns, and that’s a depressing way to end the year.”
The solution, as Kapur pointed out, lies in “better stories and better scripts”.
(Radhika Bhirani & Sandeep Sharma can be contacted at [email protected] and [email protected])
–IANS
sas-rb/vm/ky/sac
Entertainment
Casino Days Reveal Internal Data on Most Popular Smartphones
International online casino Casino Days has published a report sharing their internal data on what types and brands of devices are used to play on the platform by users from the South Asian region.
Such aggregate data analyses allow the operator to optimise their website for the brands and models of devices people are actually using.
The insights gained through the research also help Casino Days tailor their services based on the better understanding of their clients and their needs.
Desktops and Tablets Lose the Battle vs Mobile
The primary data samples analysed by Casino Days reveal that mobile connections dominate the market in South Asia and are responsible for a whopping 96.6% of gaming sessions, while computers and tablets have negligible shares of 2.9% and 0.5% respectively.
The authors of the study point out that historically, playing online casino was exclusively done on computers, and attribute thе major shift to mobile that has unfolded over time to the wide spread of cheaper smartphones and mobile data plans in South Asia.
“Some of the reasons behind this massive difference in device type are affordability, technical advantages, as well as cheaper and more obtainable internet plans for mobiles than those for computers,” the researchers comment.
Xiaomi and Vivo Outperform Samsung, Apple Way Down in Rankings
Chinese brands Xiaomi and Vivo were used by 21.9% and 20.79% of Casino Days players from South Asia respectively, and together with the positioned in third place with a 18.1% share South Korean brand Samsung dominate the market among real money gamers in the region.
Cupertino, California-based Apple is way down in seventh with a user share of just 2.29%, overshadowed by Chinese brands Realme (11.43%), OPPO (11.23%), and OnePlus (4.07%).
Huawei is at the very bottom of the chart with a tiny share just below the single percent mark, trailing behind mobile devices by Motorola, Google, and Infinix.
The data on actual phone usage provided by Casino Days, even though limited to the gaming parts of the population of South Asia, paints a different picture from global statistics on smartphone shipments by vendors.
Apple and Samsung have been sharing the worldwide lead for over a decade, while current regional leader Xiaomi secured their third position globally just a couple of years ago.
Striking Android Dominance among South Asian Real Money Gaming Communities
The shifted market share patterns of the world’s top smartphone brands in South Asia observed by the Casino Days research paper reveal a striking dominance of Android devices at the expense of iOS-powered phones.
On the global level, Android enjoys a comfortable lead with a sizable 68.79% share which grows to nearly 79% when we look at the whole continent of Asia. The data on South Asian real money gaming communities suggests that Android’s dominance grows even higher and is north of the 90% mark.
Among the major factors behind these figures, the authors of the study point to the relative affordability of and greater availability of Android devices in the region, especially when manufactured locally in countries like India and Vietnam.
“And, with influencers and tech reviews putting emphasis on Android devices, the choice of mobile phone brand and OS becomes easy; Android has a much wider range of products and caters to the Asian online casino market in ways that Apple can’t due to technical limitations,” the researchers add.
The far better integration achieved by Google Pay compared to its counterpart Apple Pay has also played a crucial role in shaping the existing smartphone market trends.
Content provided by Adverloom