Connect with us

Entertainment

The girl who kicked up a storm

Published

on

What is happening in Mumbai related to some film folks is of the never-before kind. Since the change of the dispensation in the Maharashtra secretariat in October last year, there has started a sort of conflict, if not a war, between the state government and some television news channels.There have been issues that became subjects of intense debate on channels since the day the state elections got over and the results were declared. The stories had hourly twists and turns, and a game of musical chairs started. The drama of forming the new government lasted for a few days on the news channels.That was politics but, never has there been a dull day ever since for TV channels.However, what has been going on the television channels for the last 90 days or so, which is gathering more momentum with each passing day, has captivated the minds of the television viewers. On a quiet corona lockdown Sunday, media and social media was full of the reported suicide of the rising popular film actor, Sushant Singh Rajput. Even as the dead body was being transferred to a hospital for post-mortem, the police on the scene declared the death as suicide.The media was not convinced by this instant pronouncement. It has been variously described as suicide, abetment to suicide, outcome of nepotism that prevails in the film industry as well as attempts to isolate and brand Sushant as a flop actor and so on by a few big banner bosses.But, there was little they could do. It looked like the media was running out of steam on the affair, had run out of pictures of the spot of death and other material, and even Sushant’s family seemed to be helpless.That is when the Sushant death issue was reignited. Firebrand film actor, Kangana Ranaut created a storm in the media and a flutter in the circle of the ruling political regime as well as among the high and mighty of the film industry. She averred that Sushant’s death was not a suicide. And, if it was, this was a case of abetment.

Since her first appearance on a television channels, where she blamed bigwigs of the production sector for the death of Sushant, she has activated a chain of events whereby this death case has turned into a conflict between police/state of Maharashtra and the media, the states of Maharashtra and Bihar, CBI/NCB/ED and the media versus the Maharashtra ruling Aghadi, mostly the Shiv Sena.There is not a day when the Sushant Singh Rajput story does not take a new turn, with twists aplenty. The twists have, over a period of the last month or so, revolved around murder, drug mafia, Dubai connect, police indifference, politicians’ involvement as well as the misuse of the government machinery like the Greater Mumbai Municipal Corporation (GMMC), which, a few days back destroyed Kangana Ranaut’s office property in the upmarket Pali Hill area of Mumbai.From Police versus media to Bihar versus Maharashtra, now the case has paused at Kangana Ranaut versus the State of Maharashtra ruling parties. The media that matters stands with Kangana.The thing to discuss here is that never ever in the living memory of the film industry has there been such an open conflict between a state and an individual from the film industry, a female star at that!The film industry has always been under the thumb of the governments that be. The governments had an indirect control on the film industry in various ways: There was the central excise department, the censor board, the Films Division, the income tax department, the permissions to shoot and, when it came to the state level governments, impractical entertainment taxes, show tax, municipal tax and, for the cinema halls, as many as 22 departmental permissions to be renewed every year! The grip was, complete though the general public was oblivious to such details.This was during the normal times, the worst the industry had to face was during the Emergency era. Filmmakers were forced to comply with the whims of the government.

Raj Kapoor, who never wanted his films to be shown on the government-owned Doordarshan, was forced to give his films for telecast. “Mughal-E-Azam”, which served as an ATM for its producers because it drew full houses whenever it was booked by an exhibitor, was forcefully telecast, too! And, what did the producer or the rights holder get? A meagre 4 or 5 lakh rupees while destroying its re-run prospect forever. The film industry had no status as such with the powers that be.However, things started improving post Emergency when a change took place at the Centre. And things kept improving gradually. A lot of norms were relaxed and the industry also got recognised as an industry that was entitled to bank finance.Just when the film industry was getting some status, this had to happen.Stories of coteries, same sex scandals, nepotism, binding actors in contracts, honey traps, drug chains and, worst of all, the unnatural death of Sushant Singh Rajput and his business acquaintance, Disha Salian.What has surprised the world is that the local government, instead solve this death, drugs and such, has declared a war on Kangana Ranaut and a media house. The industry was never united and, instead of standing with Kangana as one of their own, has preferred to be silent.Never has it happened that an individual has taken on a government, state or otherwise, and the government, in turn, retaliating by destroying her property worth crores.Starting with the suspicious deaths of two young people, an actor and his publicist, drugs, and the alleged political connect has led to the involvement of three national investigation agencies, the CBI, the Enforcement Directorate and the Narcotics Control Bureau. Due to the open threats of harm to Kangana probably, for the first time for a film personality, Y-plus security has been provided to her.The television news channels seem to have just a limited agenda for over a month now, revolving around Sushant Singh Rajput, Disha Salian and Kangana Ranaut. This coverage may surely be giving the OTT platforms releasing new content on regular basis a run for their money.But, why is the state government so sensitive to this issue, that not caring for its credibility it has decided to stand with the prime accused?

Entertainment

Casino Days Reveal Internal Data on Most Popular Smartphones

Published

on

By

CasinoDays India

International online casino Casino Days has published a report sharing their internal data on what types and brands of devices are used to play on the platform by users from the South Asian region.

Such aggregate data analyses allow the operator to optimise their website for the brands and models of devices people are actually using.

The insights gained through the research also help Casino Days tailor their services based on the better understanding of their clients and their needs.

Desktops and Tablets Lose the Battle vs Mobile

The primary data samples analysed by Casino Days reveal that mobile connections dominate the market in South Asia and are responsible for a whopping 96.6% of gaming sessions, while computers and tablets have negligible shares of 2.9% and 0.5% respectively.

CasinoDays India

The authors of the study point out that historically, playing online casino was exclusively done on computers, and attribute thе major shift to mobile that has unfolded over time to the wide spread of cheaper smartphones and mobile data plans in South Asia.

“Some of the reasons behind this massive difference in device type are affordability, technical advantages, as well as cheaper and more obtainable internet plans for mobiles than those for computers,” the researchers comment.

Xiaomi and Vivo Outperform Samsung, Apple Way Down in Rankings

Chinese brands Xiaomi and Vivo were used by 21.9% and 20.79% of Casino Days players from South Asia respectively, and together with the positioned in third place with a 18.1% share South Korean brand Samsung dominate the market among real money gamers in the region.

 

CasinoDays India

Cupertino, California-based Apple is way down in seventh with a user share of just 2.29%, overshadowed by Chinese brands Realme (11.43%), OPPO (11.23%), and OnePlus (4.07%).

Huawei is at the very bottom of the chart with a tiny share just below the single percent mark, trailing behind mobile devices by Motorola, Google, and Infinix.

The data on actual phone usage provided by Casino Days, even though limited to the gaming parts of the population of South Asia, paints a different picture from global statistics on smartphone shipments by vendors.

Apple and Samsung have been sharing the worldwide lead for over a decade, while current regional leader Xiaomi secured their third position globally just a couple of years ago.

Striking Android Dominance among South Asian Real Money Gaming Communities

The shifted market share patterns of the world’s top smartphone brands in South Asia observed by the Casino Days research paper reveal a striking dominance of Android devices at the expense of iOS-powered phones.

On the global level, Android enjoys a comfortable lead with a sizable 68.79% share which grows to nearly 79% when we look at the whole continent of Asia. The data on South Asian real money gaming communities suggests that Android’s dominance grows even higher and is north of the 90% mark.

Among the major factors behind these figures, the authors of the study point to the relative affordability of and greater availability of Android devices in the region, especially when manufactured locally in countries like India and Vietnam.

“And, with influencers and tech reviews putting emphasis on Android devices, the choice of mobile phone brand and OS becomes easy; Android has a much wider range of products and caters to the Asian online casino market in ways that Apple can’t due to technical limitations,” the researchers add.

The far better integration achieved by Google Pay compared to its counterpart Apple Pay has also played a crucial role in shaping the existing smartphone market trends.

 

Content provided by Adverloom

Continue Reading

Trending