Regional
‘Mughal museum’ which now named as ‘Chhatrapati Shivaji museum’ also maintain Braj artifacts.
The museum in Agra initially deliberate to showcase the town’s Mughal tradition, now renamed after Maratha warrior-king Shivaji, may even endure a “conceptual change”.Extra chief secretary, UP, Awanish Awasthi informed on Tuesday “the museum will likely be devoted to what’s Indian, the Braj tradition, custom and heritage”. This comes a day after CM Yogi Adityanath stated the unique identify, Mughal Museum, was a show of “servility” as a result of Mughals “can’t be our heroes.” So, the CM had stated, the museum would as an alternative be named after 17th-century Maratha ruler Chhatrapati Shivaji, who had engaged for 27 years in wars towards the Mughals.
Work on the museum, arising close to the japanese gate of the Taj Mahal, had began in 2016 with a 2017 completion goal. “The thought was to introduce vacationers to the grand Mughal period of the town. In a creatively crafted house, Mughal historical past and structure could be on show … Historians and students had been to be introduced on the committee to make sure accuracy,” Alok Ranjan, former chief secretary who was a part of the undertaking when its basis was laid by then chief minister Akhilesh Yadav, informed .
The choice to alter what the museum will showcase has stunned historians. “Mughals had been in Hindustan 150 years earlier than Taj was constructed. All monuments in Agra had been constructed by them. The historical past of the town is the historical past of Mughals,” historian and professor emeritus at Aligarh Muslim College Irfan Habib informed . “I don’t have an opinion on what the museum ought to be known as however that is fallacious.”
Different lecturers stated they had been shocked. “It’s stunning to study {that a} museum in a Mughal metropolis will likely be named after Shivaji. There isn’t any connection besides that he was imprisoned in 1666 within the haveli of Ram Singh, son of Mirza Raja Jai Singh, who had defeated Shivaji and compelled him to give up. Later, he escaped from Agra,” stated Prof M Pundhir from AMU’s historical past division.
Former chairperson of the division, Prof Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi, added, “Braj is a area dedicated to the cult of Krishna and Chaitanya, it has no hyperlink with Shivaji … It’s normal consensus that museums close to monuments replicate the tradition of the latter. They might construct one other museum away from Mughal monuments for Braj tradition. Vacationers come to Agra to see Mughal structure. After they wish to soak in Braj tradition, they go to Mathura. A metropolis’s historical past can’t be stored apart.”
For now, although, work on the construction is stalled. “About 75% of the undertaking is full…the exhibition design plan has been initiated,” a consultant of Noida-based architectural agency Studio Archohm stated. The agency is collaborating with UK-based architect David Chipperfield’s Berlin workplace for the undertaking.
Home
What monkey fled with a bag containing evidence in it: Read full story
The court, generally, considers a person who commit a crime and the one who destroys the evidence, as criminals in the eyes of law. But what if an animal destroys the evidence of a crime committed by a human.
In a peculiar incident in Rajasthan, a monkey fled away with the evidence collected by the police in a murder case. The stolen evidence included the murder weapon (a blood-stained knife).
The incident came to light when the police appeared before the court and they had to provide the evidence in the hearing.
The hearing was about the crime which took place in September 2016, in which a person named Shashikant Sharma died at a primary health center under Chandwaji police station. After the body was found, the deceased’s relatives blocked the Jaipur-Delhi highway, demanding an inquiry into the matter.
Following the investigation, the police had arrested Rahul Kandera and Mohanlal Kandera, residents of Chandwaji in relation to the murder. But, when the time came to produce the evidence related to the case, it was found that the police had no evidence with them because a monkey had stolen it from them.
In the court, the police said that the knife, which was the primary evidence, was also taken by the monkey. The cops informed that the evidence of the case was kept in a bag, which was being taken to the court.
The evidence bag contained the knife and 15 other important evidences. However, due to the lack of space in the malkhana, a bag full of evidence was kept under a tree, which led to the incident.