Home
“We won’t accept any committee formed by SC for mediation” chief of Krantikari Kisan Union.
Farmer unions against the central farm legal guidelines on Tuesday mentioned the keep on implementation of farm legislations was not an answer because it may very well be undone any time and due to this fact they might proceed their protests on two key calls for — repeal of legal guidelines and a authorized assure to MSP — and go forward with a march in Delhi on Republic Day.
Union representatives criticised the composition of the committee, saying all 4 members are pro-farm legal guidelines and in opposition to the repeal demand. They dominated out any truck with the SC-appointed panel even whether it is expanded to incorporate wider illustration, underlining that they might moderately have interaction with authorities to get the legal guidelines repealed. They made it clear that the unions would take part in talks with the federal government on January 15.
“We won’t accept any committee formed by the SC for mediation. We knew that the government will get a committee formed through SC to take the burden off its shoulders. That’s the reason we issued a statement last night, saying we won’t appear before any committee,” mentioned Darshan Pal, chief of Krantikari Kisan Union.
“Everybody knows about the pro-government approach of the committee members. They had been writing in support of the farm laws. It seems to be a ploy of the government that instead of forming a committee on its own, it has made the apex court do so, but we will not fall in the trap. We will not accept any committee…,” mentioned farmer chief Balbir Singh Rajewal echoing Pal.
Farmer representatives Prem Singh Bhangu, Jagjit Singh Dallewal and Jagmohan Singh mentioned the federal government wished to place their demand of repealing the legal guidelines into chilly storage by forming a committee. “We’ve made it clear we do not need any mediation from a panel. The matter should be discussed in Parliament,” they added.
Reacting to the SC order, unions’ umbrella physique, Samyukta Kisan Morcha, issued a joint assertion saying suspending the implementation of the legal guidelines as an interim measure is welcome however “is not a solution and the farmer unions have not been asking for this solution, given the fact that the implementation can be reinstated at any time.” The Morcha was additionally essential of the composition of the committee and mentioned, “It is clear the Court is being misguided by various forces even in its constitution of a committee.”
Home
What monkey fled with a bag containing evidence in it: Read full story
The court, generally, considers a person who commit a crime and the one who destroys the evidence, as criminals in the eyes of law. But what if an animal destroys the evidence of a crime committed by a human.
In a peculiar incident in Rajasthan, a monkey fled away with the evidence collected by the police in a murder case. The stolen evidence included the murder weapon (a blood-stained knife).
The incident came to light when the police appeared before the court and they had to provide the evidence in the hearing.
The hearing was about the crime which took place in September 2016, in which a person named Shashikant Sharma died at a primary health center under Chandwaji police station. After the body was found, the deceased’s relatives blocked the Jaipur-Delhi highway, demanding an inquiry into the matter.
Following the investigation, the police had arrested Rahul Kandera and Mohanlal Kandera, residents of Chandwaji in relation to the murder. But, when the time came to produce the evidence related to the case, it was found that the police had no evidence with them because a monkey had stolen it from them.
In the court, the police said that the knife, which was the primary evidence, was also taken by the monkey. The cops informed that the evidence of the case was kept in a bag, which was being taken to the court.
The evidence bag contained the knife and 15 other important evidences. However, due to the lack of space in the malkhana, a bag full of evidence was kept under a tree, which led to the incident.