Home
Huge loss for China in Galwan Valley: Read full story here
The Klaxon, an Australian tabloid, stated in an investigative report that China had suffered a devastating loss in the Galwan Valley encounter in 2020.
According to the exclusive findings of the editor, Anthony Klan, China’s casualties were significantly more than what was stated, since many men drowned while crossing a river in the valley.
According to the author, data and photographs from two distinct clashes in Galwan were mixed to obscure facts.
Though China did not reveal the number of casualties in the Galwan fight, it did award posthumous medals to four soldiers who died in the combat, according to the article. However, only four names were published, while the total number of losses was up to 38.
The Klaxon assembled an independent team of social media researchers for this inquiry, who discovered that China’s casualties went much beyond the four soldiers named by Beijing.
China went to great measures to keep the conflict from being discussed
Many Chinese soldiers were killed in the early stages of the June 15-16 battle while attempting to swim in the fast-flowing Galwan river in sub-zero temperatures, according to a report released by these social media researchers titled ‘Galwan Decoded.’
Watch | Gravitas: WION Exclusive: What transpired at the Galwan valley
“At least 38 PLA troops, including Wang, perished that night,” the report added, citing various Weibo users. “Of the four officially dead soldiers, only Wang was declared.”
“China’s losses in the high-altitude 2020 Galwan Valley border clash with India — the deadliest confrontation between the two giants in over four decades — were much higher than reported, with many soldiers drowning while crossing a fast-flowing, sub-zero river in darkness, new research claims,” the report said.
The inquiry lasted a year, with materials gathered from mainland Chinese bloggers, residents, and media publications that Beijing had removed.
“Beijing has retained a lot of information regarding what truly happened, what led to the skirmish, and concealed it.What China told the rest of the world was basically made-up stories. According to the publication, “many blogs and pages have been purged by (Chinese officials), but digital archives of mainland China indicate a different story.”
Following a severe skirmish in the Pangong lake area on May 5, 2020, the border stalemate in eastern Ladakh erupted, and both sides gradually increased their deployment by bringing in tens of thousands of soldiers as well as heavy equipment.
As a result of a series of military and diplomatic talks, the two parties concluded the disengagement process in Gogra, as well as on the north and south banks of the Pangong lake, last year.
In the sensitive sector, each side has between 50,000 and 60,000 troops deployed along the Line of Actual Control.
Home
What monkey fled with a bag containing evidence in it: Read full story
The court, generally, considers a person who commit a crime and the one who destroys the evidence, as criminals in the eyes of law. But what if an animal destroys the evidence of a crime committed by a human.
In a peculiar incident in Rajasthan, a monkey fled away with the evidence collected by the police in a murder case. The stolen evidence included the murder weapon (a blood-stained knife).
The incident came to light when the police appeared before the court and they had to provide the evidence in the hearing.
The hearing was about the crime which took place in September 2016, in which a person named Shashikant Sharma died at a primary health center under Chandwaji police station. After the body was found, the deceased’s relatives blocked the Jaipur-Delhi highway, demanding an inquiry into the matter.
Following the investigation, the police had arrested Rahul Kandera and Mohanlal Kandera, residents of Chandwaji in relation to the murder. But, when the time came to produce the evidence related to the case, it was found that the police had no evidence with them because a monkey had stolen it from them.
In the court, the police said that the knife, which was the primary evidence, was also taken by the monkey. The cops informed that the evidence of the case was kept in a bag, which was being taken to the court.
The evidence bag contained the knife and 15 other important evidences. However, due to the lack of space in the malkhana, a bag full of evidence was kept under a tree, which led to the incident.