Home
LSG skipper KL Rahul was fuming after the first innings: Know why
Lucknow Super Giants beat Punjab Kings by 20 runs here at Maharashtra Cricket Association Stadium on Friday to register their sixth win in nine matches. But despite the victory LSG captain KL Rahul is not happy with the batting performance of his side as his team at one stage was 98/1 crumbled to 126/7.
“I was fuming after the first innings because it was stupid cricket with the bat, the experienced guys in the team. It does happen but we did talk about it at the timeout that it’s a tricky pitch but 160 is something we can put on the board. But a couple of bad shots and the runout didn’t help. I was unhappy with that middle phase but this game has been completely about the bowlers,” said Lucknow Super Giants captain KL Rahul in the post-match presentation ceremony.
Dushmantha Chameera’s 17-run cameo of 10 balls and Mohsin Khan’s 13-run knock from six balls helped Lucknow Super Giants put on a competitive 153/8 in 20 overs.
“The way they scored those crucial 25-30 runs at the back end and then the way they bowled throughout the 20 overs was brilliant. They executed their plans to perfection and they held their nerve. They were brave with the bat and ball, so really happy with the way we played as a team but batting unit I think we need to go back and get better,” said KL Rahul.
After KL Rahul’s early dismissal Quinton de Kock’s played a 46-run knock and Deepak Hooda’s scored a 34-run knock. The duo struck 85 runs for the second wicket but none of them went on to play a big knock to take Lucknow to a big total.
“We felt we did well to get to 60 in nine overs and paced it really well then after that timeout, they got going and were hitting boundaries. It was a tricky pitch and we knew it was not a 180-190 wicket. If one of the top 3 had continued and gotten a 70 or 80, we probably would have got 10 or 15 runs extra, but that didn’t happen and we lost four or five wickets in the space of three or four overs and that pushed us back a little bit. But the way we responded with the ball was phenomenal,” explained KL Rahul.
All-rounder Krunal Pandya was brilliant with the ball picking up two wickets for 11 runs in four overs. He also picked wickets of Bhanuka Rajapaksa and Jitesh Sharma and earned the ‘Player of the Match’ award.
“He’s been brilliant throughout the tournament and he’s someone who’s… he’s always been an economical bowler every other IPL season but I think this season he’s really worked on his bowling and is getting us those crucial wickets in the middle which is what teams need. You need to take wickets in the middle so you can put pressure on the batters,” said KL Rahul.
Home
What monkey fled with a bag containing evidence in it: Read full story
The court, generally, considers a person who commit a crime and the one who destroys the evidence, as criminals in the eyes of law. But what if an animal destroys the evidence of a crime committed by a human.
In a peculiar incident in Rajasthan, a monkey fled away with the evidence collected by the police in a murder case. The stolen evidence included the murder weapon (a blood-stained knife).
The incident came to light when the police appeared before the court and they had to provide the evidence in the hearing.
The hearing was about the crime which took place in September 2016, in which a person named Shashikant Sharma died at a primary health center under Chandwaji police station. After the body was found, the deceased’s relatives blocked the Jaipur-Delhi highway, demanding an inquiry into the matter.
Following the investigation, the police had arrested Rahul Kandera and Mohanlal Kandera, residents of Chandwaji in relation to the murder. But, when the time came to produce the evidence related to the case, it was found that the police had no evidence with them because a monkey had stolen it from them.
In the court, the police said that the knife, which was the primary evidence, was also taken by the monkey. The cops informed that the evidence of the case was kept in a bag, which was being taken to the court.
The evidence bag contained the knife and 15 other important evidences. However, due to the lack of space in the malkhana, a bag full of evidence was kept under a tree, which led to the incident.