Regional
Allahabad HC chief justice concerned over pendency of cases
Ghaziabad: Expressing concern over pendency of cases, Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Dhananjay Yeshwant Chandrachud on Friday said Ghaziabad judgeship alone has 1.44 lakh cases pending before it since its inception in 1976.
Other districts in Uttar Pradesh also follow the same trend, Justice Chandrachud said while addressing a function to inaugurate the CBI court complex here.
In view of delayed justice, the Allahabad high court has launched a drive to build up infrastructure on a priority basis and to fill vacancies. “A total of 1,900 courts will come into existence through our efforts,” he said.
He said the high court has requested the state government to identify land for establishment or expansion of courts in all 75 districts.
“District courts are laying the foundation of justice. So their infrastructure plays an important role in delivery of justice.”
Home
What monkey fled with a bag containing evidence in it: Read full story
The court, generally, considers a person who commit a crime and the one who destroys the evidence, as criminals in the eyes of law. But what if an animal destroys the evidence of a crime committed by a human.
In a peculiar incident in Rajasthan, a monkey fled away with the evidence collected by the police in a murder case. The stolen evidence included the murder weapon (a blood-stained knife).
The incident came to light when the police appeared before the court and they had to provide the evidence in the hearing.
The hearing was about the crime which took place in September 2016, in which a person named Shashikant Sharma died at a primary health center under Chandwaji police station. After the body was found, the deceased’s relatives blocked the Jaipur-Delhi highway, demanding an inquiry into the matter.
Following the investigation, the police had arrested Rahul Kandera and Mohanlal Kandera, residents of Chandwaji in relation to the murder. But, when the time came to produce the evidence related to the case, it was found that the police had no evidence with them because a monkey had stolen it from them.
In the court, the police said that the knife, which was the primary evidence, was also taken by the monkey. The cops informed that the evidence of the case was kept in a bag, which was being taken to the court.
The evidence bag contained the knife and 15 other important evidences. However, due to the lack of space in the malkhana, a bag full of evidence was kept under a tree, which led to the incident.