Entertainment
‘Ittefaq’: Desecrating a classic (Film review)
By Subhash K Jha
Film: “Ittefaq”; Cast: Akshaye Khanna,Sidharth Malhotra, Sonakshi Sinha; Director: Abhay Chopra; Rating: * 1/2 (one and a half stars)
This 2-hour thriller claiming to be a taut, revisionist version of the 1969 classic produced by this film director’s father and directed by his uncle, actually seems to last much longer than its playing time.
“Ittefaq” is one long stretch and a yawn. Unlike the original, the action in the remake jumps all over the place like a frog during the mating season. The characters run around a lot. But we are never interested in where they are going, or whom they were trying to bump off and why. This is not a whodunit. This is a who cares whodunit disguised as a whodunit.
And the real murder victim is the original film’s script. Yash Chopra’s “Ittefaq” has been mauled and moulded into shapes that the original creators never intended. The real murder happens not in the film but during the scripting sessions where someone must have had the bright idea of re-doing “Ittefaq” because what the f..k – it’s less costly more safe than doing an original.
So in the original we had Rajesh Khanna as a painter accused of killing his wife, and Nanda, in an image volte face, a woman who murders her own husband. The painter is converted into bestseller writer named Vikram Sethi. As played by Siddharth Malhotra, he is anything but a suitable boy.
In the new version, there are twists galore oh yes, so many twists that at one point I wanted to jump out of my seat and burst into R.D. Burman’s “Aao Twist Karen”. But I held my peace. In the hope that Abhay Chopra and his co-writers Shreyas Jain and Nikhil Mehrotra would finally make peace with the original.
But no. Till the end, the new “Ittefaq” remains an atrocious atrophied piece of sleuthing travesty littered with incriminating remnants of a glorious past when content was Queen and Rajesh Khanna was King. The neo-“Ittefaq” fails on both counts. The plot is subverted and turned around so neatly that the “shock” ending will shock only those who have never watched any episodes of “CID”.
Come to think of it, the whodunits on television are far more charming and enticing than this.
“Ittefaq” attempts to be clever but ends up tripping over its own cleverness. The two protagonists are played at a feverish pitch of self-obsession. Both Siddharth Malhotra and Sonakshi Sinha want to be captured in the best light possible. To their good fortune, cinematographer Michal Luka lights up the night life of the characters’ elitist lifestyle in magical mystical ways, tricks that belong to some other film. Here the gorgeous lighting only spotlights the emptiness of a script that’s denuded of empathy and protagonists who are stripped of all their magnetism.
Siddharth and Sonakshi try hard to fill the original shoes. Malhotra even has a “showreel” sequence in prison – you know that footage that they play when an actors is nominated for an award – where he sobs over a plate of terrible prison food.
Nothing as terrible as what we are served.
The third protagonist, a wry cop played with rigorous relish by Akshaye Khanna tries to hold the film’s glaring, blinding flaws away from the light. But “Ittefaq”, I am afraid, stands exposed as one of the hollowest remakes of Indian cinema.
Incidentally the cop has a seemingly interesting family life with Mandira Bedi playing his delectably teasing wife. I would have preferred to see a film about the cop’s family rather than the two posturing fugitives. Either could be the Akiller (not that anyone cares). Either way it is the audiences’ patience and faith that die a painful death as a 2-hour film plods on to seem like a eternal punishment meted out to all fans of suspense thrillers.
There are points where the narrative comes awake from its dormant condition only to lie back and snooze all over again as director Chopra piles the atrocious plot manoeuvrings with preposterous paddings, like cops who joke about murder and victims’ corpses, and a cop who discusses vital clues of a murder case over the potty.
All good taste gets flushed down the toilet. There should be laws against relatives of artistes vandalizing the movie classics. Imagine if Shah Jahan’s grandchildren decided to add extra rooms into the Taj Mahal. Or if Leonardo da Vinci’s grandchildren decided to turn that eternal smile on Mona Lisa’s face into a frown – that’s what “Ittefaq” makes you feel.
The real suspense, if you ask me, is why are Shah Rukh Khan and Ranbir Kapoor thanked in the opening credits? Maybe for sitting through the film and actually laughing at the cops’ jokes about crime and punishment, and for not laughing when Sonakshi tells Malhotra, “I wish my husband was like you.”
This has got to be the worst pass ever made by a female actor to her co-star.
Do yourself a favour. Don’t watch this pale inert uninvolving remake. Watch the original. And see why Rajesh Khanna was the greatest star-actor ever.
–IANS
skj/vd
Entertainment
Casino Days Reveal Internal Data on Most Popular Smartphones
International online casino Casino Days has published a report sharing their internal data on what types and brands of devices are used to play on the platform by users from the South Asian region.
Such aggregate data analyses allow the operator to optimise their website for the brands and models of devices people are actually using.
The insights gained through the research also help Casino Days tailor their services based on the better understanding of their clients and their needs.
Desktops and Tablets Lose the Battle vs Mobile
The primary data samples analysed by Casino Days reveal that mobile connections dominate the market in South Asia and are responsible for a whopping 96.6% of gaming sessions, while computers and tablets have negligible shares of 2.9% and 0.5% respectively.
The authors of the study point out that historically, playing online casino was exclusively done on computers, and attribute thе major shift to mobile that has unfolded over time to the wide spread of cheaper smartphones and mobile data plans in South Asia.
“Some of the reasons behind this massive difference in device type are affordability, technical advantages, as well as cheaper and more obtainable internet plans for mobiles than those for computers,” the researchers comment.
Xiaomi and Vivo Outperform Samsung, Apple Way Down in Rankings
Chinese brands Xiaomi and Vivo were used by 21.9% and 20.79% of Casino Days players from South Asia respectively, and together with the positioned in third place with a 18.1% share South Korean brand Samsung dominate the market among real money gamers in the region.
Cupertino, California-based Apple is way down in seventh with a user share of just 2.29%, overshadowed by Chinese brands Realme (11.43%), OPPO (11.23%), and OnePlus (4.07%).
Huawei is at the very bottom of the chart with a tiny share just below the single percent mark, trailing behind mobile devices by Motorola, Google, and Infinix.
The data on actual phone usage provided by Casino Days, even though limited to the gaming parts of the population of South Asia, paints a different picture from global statistics on smartphone shipments by vendors.
Apple and Samsung have been sharing the worldwide lead for over a decade, while current regional leader Xiaomi secured their third position globally just a couple of years ago.
Striking Android Dominance among South Asian Real Money Gaming Communities
The shifted market share patterns of the world’s top smartphone brands in South Asia observed by the Casino Days research paper reveal a striking dominance of Android devices at the expense of iOS-powered phones.
On the global level, Android enjoys a comfortable lead with a sizable 68.79% share which grows to nearly 79% when we look at the whole continent of Asia. The data on South Asian real money gaming communities suggests that Android’s dominance grows even higher and is north of the 90% mark.
Among the major factors behind these figures, the authors of the study point to the relative affordability of and greater availability of Android devices in the region, especially when manufactured locally in countries like India and Vietnam.
“And, with influencers and tech reviews putting emphasis on Android devices, the choice of mobile phone brand and OS becomes easy; Android has a much wider range of products and caters to the Asian online casino market in ways that Apple can’t due to technical limitations,” the researchers add.
The far better integration achieved by Google Pay compared to its counterpart Apple Pay has also played a crucial role in shaping the existing smartphone market trends.
Content provided by Adverloom